comprare viagra
cheap propecia
cheap viagra without prescription
cialis cheap
cheap viagra sale cheap phentermine online
generic pastillas viagra
buy viagra
viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra cheap viagra Discount Pharmacy Viagra
POPULAR CULTURE PIECES TRANSFORMED | Review

Mid-America's Visual Arts Publication

POPULAR CULTURE PIECES TRANSFORMED

A review of Tom Huck's Terror in Black and White and Jesse Small's Twiganatomy

JesseSmall_TalkBubbles

Jesse Small, detail of group of "TalkBubbles," porcelain. Image: courtesy of the gallery



Sherry Leedy Contemporary Art

Kansas City, Missouri
May 7 — June 26, 2010

My main response to the two exhibitions currently at the Sherry Leedy gallery derives from childhood experience. Being a child of the 1980s, I have a certain reaction evoked when confronted with imagery pertaining to that decade. The work of Jesse Small, whose exhibition Twiganatomy elicits, firstly, a Pop-Art sensibility derived from a cultural phenomenon that was only beginning to make its appearance on the real of "high” art. This is the realm of video games. The popularity of the video arcade in the late '70s through the '80s, as well as the characters it has borne, has been present in the collective psyche of the generation of people born in within these few years.

JesseSmall_Ghost

Jesse Small, "Ghost," porcelain. Image: courtesy of the gallery

This is why Jesse Small’s sculptural depictions of one of the most easily recognizable characters from the early days of the arcade, the ghosts from the game Pac-Man, initially elicit a sense of nostalgic fun. This, combined with their brightly colored, graphic-laden surfaces, as well as the way many of them are displayed upon old arcade boxes set on their sides, adds to the sense of lighthearted creativity that is instantly attractive.

Closer inspection, however, finds an undercurrent of social activism that brings a more meditative tone to these sculptures. Various ghosts are enveloped with the trappings of media: letters, numbers, and cartoon “talk boxes” filled with nothing but the overlapping lines of the hundreds of other empty dialogs that vie for space of the surfaces of unknowing, animated symbols of the human spirit, and, more technically, outdated software.

The chandeliers that make up the other half of the work by Small are more difficult to read. Their bright colors and symmetry oppose the arboreal inspiration from which they derive. Their intricacy is also overtly manmade, and is reminiscent of lace, made of cut plastic and steel. By combining the idea of natural and the form of the technological, Small presents the viewer with an interesting dichotomy, one that is a portrayal of the world that we live in.

In contrast to Small’s delicate, more cerebral sculptures, Tom Huck’s large woodcut prints attack the senses with the sights, sound, and odors of an America drowning in its own vices. The strong graphic quality of the woodcut, as well as its stark value contrast, enhance Huck’s sideshow vision of a Midwest-gone-Inferno. Even the title of his exhibition, Terror in Black and White, lends to the atmosphere of these pieces. The prints themselves are massive and take years of work to complete — and within the heavy presence of such an effort, lost souls of a crazed alternate universe peer out. Bodies are flayed and roasted on spits above barbecue grills as slovenly, pigged-nosed figures wallow around it, guzzling beer and peeling hunks of flesh from the eviscerated torsos for consumption. In every inch of Huck’s visions hedonism reigns unchecked. The chaotic American disintegration shown here is not terribly hard for someone who has grown up in the land of Wal-Mart to envision.

TomHuck_BrandyBaghead

Tom Huck, "The Transformation of Brandy Baghead," woodcut print triptych: "Part 1: Beta-Caro-Teen Queen," 82" x 24", "Part II: America's Next Top Omelette," 82" x 48", "Part III: Skating with the Scars," 82" x 24", 2007-2009. Image: courtesy of the gallery

Huck’s prints, while rooted in the contemporary American condition, can be compared to earlier satirical artists. American cartoonist Robert Crumb, whose work continues to raise eyebrows, is an obvious choice for comparison, and a known influence of Huck. Other artists also come to mind. The British satirical painter William Hogarth, with his cautionary series The Rake’s Progress, can be seen within the same vein as Huck’s detail laden, slyly moralistic images. Even from a comparison with Huck’s work, The Transformation of Brandy Baghead Part II: America’s Next Top Omelette, with 16th-century Mannerist painter Bronzino’s work, Venus, Cupid, Folly, and Time, one can derive a similarity in the elongated forms, bawdy subject matter, and both technically and socially enthralling subject matter.

TomHuck_HedgeApple

Tom Huck, "Hedgeapple Warfare," woodcut print, edition of 60, 15.5" x 44.25", 2006. Image: courtesy of the gallery

The best part about these two exhibitions is the juxtaposition of one to the other. The gripping, graphic vision of consumerist Hell in Huck’s work plays against Small’s brightly colored meditations on media saturation and overpopulation in such a way as to simultaneously exhibit artistic craftsmanship and driving social issues thoughtfully and successfully.

JesseSmall_LibraryofBabel

Jesse Small, "Library of Babel (chandelier), enameled steel and hardware. Image: courtesy of the gallery


-re-

Popularity: 8% [?]

LoadingUpdating...

Tagged as: , ,

2 Responses »

  1. Jesse Small's is a f***ing genius. Get over it, haters, and let the lovers be love.

  2. Does it appear to anyone else that Jesse Small's work is a metaphor for how media has overloaded and pressed down upon the domes of our minds? Hence, his literal use of transfer decal. Is this pac man form also really a symbol for us individually?As game pieces in the battle of life or individuals on the bus ride of life? Huck's work on the other hand reminds me very much of be of Ivan Le Lorranine Albright's work with a twist. Yet ,Huck's work laughs sinisterly right back at us. It seems to reason that Albright had a serious disposition. Was this his way of coping with and depicting the moral corruption of his times? But, like Red Grooms, Huck has chose to use humor to smack society in the face. He wisely understands that color is unnecessary to portray this ever present corruption and decay in American society.

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.